Help us  
 lost species

Donate today  

Bushveld elephant shrews Elephantulus intufi occur on Kalahari sands

Risso’s Dolphin

Grampus griseus

2025 Red list status

Least Concern

Decline
Regional Population Trend

Unknown

Change compared
to 2016

No Change

Overview
Red list assessment
Regional Distribution and Occurrence
Climate change
Population information
Population genetics
Habitats and ecology
Use and Trade
Threats
Conservation
Bibliography

Overview

Grampus griseus – (G. Cuvier, 1812)

ANIMALIA – CHORDATA – MAMMALIA – ARTIODACTYLA – DELPHINIDAE – Grampus – griseus 

Common Names: Risso’s Dolphin, Grey Dolphin (English), Risso se Dolfyn (Afrikaans), Calderón gris, Delfín de Risso (Spanish; Castilian), Dauphin de Risso (French), Delfin griú (Maltese), Glavati dupin (Croatian), Grampo (Italian), Grampus (Turkish), Okrogloglavi delfin (Slovenian), Rundkopfdelfin (German), σταχτοδέλφινο (stachtodélfino) (Greek, Modern (1453-))
Synonyms: Delphinus griseus G. Cuvier, 1812; Grampus rissoanus (Gray 1850) 

Taxonomic Note: 
The genus Grampus contains a single species, the Risso’s Dolphin (Grampus griseus). No subspecies are recognised (Committee on Taxonomy 2021). 

A skull belonging a South African specimen, previously ascribed to G. richardsonii (Gray 1865) from the South African Museum was later found to belong to the North Atlantic species G. griseus by True (1889). This species is now recognised throughout the tropical and temperate regions of all major oceans. Though there is evidence of morphological and genetic variation between and within oceans, these population divisions remain unclear, and no subspecies are currently recognised (Baird 2002). Much geographic variation in body size has been documented, for example, North Atlantic specimens reach lengths of approximately 4.0 m, while individuals from South Africa are recorded to average 3.41 m (Ross 1984). 

Red List Status: LC – Least Concern, (IUCN version 3.1) 

Assessment Information

Assessors: Penry, G.1,2, Plön, S.3 & da Silva, J.4 

Reviewer: Purdon, J.2,5

Contributor: Hofmeyr, G.6

Institutions: 1Nelson Mandela University, 2The Whale Unit, University of Pretoria, 3University of Cape Town, 4South African National Biodiversity Institute,5TUT Nature Conservation, 6Port Elizabeth Museum at Bayworld 

Previous Assessors: Plön, S. & Cockcroft, V. 

Previous Reviewer: Child, M.F. 

Previous Contributors: Relton, C. & Atkins, S. 

Assessment Rationale 

Although no data on population dynamics are available for Risso’s Dolphins, there are no known threats that could cause a range-wide decline, and this species is not a conservation priority. The biggest threat within the assessment region, the Chokka/Cape Hope squid (Loligo reynaudii) fishery, is localised. However, a recent collapse of the fishery may be responsible for a lack of strandings off the south-eastern coast of South Africa. This may have caused the animals to move offshore to feed on other prey species, thus being less likely to strand (Plön et al. 2020). Thus, this threat should be monitored. Currently, the species is listed as Least Concern, in line with the global assessment.

Regional population effects: The Risso’s Dolphin is a wide-ranging, pelagic species, and although its movements and seasonality are largely unknown, no barriers to dispersal have been recognised, thus rescue effects are possible. 

Reasons for Change 

Reason(s) for Change in Red List Category from the Previous Assessment: No change 

Red List Index 

Red List Index: No change 

Recommended citations: Penry G, Plön S & da Silva JM. 2025. A conservation assessment of Grampus griseus. In Patel T, Smith C, Roxburgh L, da Silva JM & Raimondo D, editors. The Red List of Mammals of South Africa, Eswatini and Lesotho. South African National Biodiversity Institute and Endangered Wildlife Trust, South Africa.

Regional Distribution and occurrence

Geographic Range

Risso’s Dolphins are located extensively throughout tropical and temperate regions of both the southern and northern hemisphere, predominantly in waters more than 1,000 m deep on the continental slope but also have an apparent preference for the steep continental shelf edges between 400–1,000 m deep (Kruse et al. 1999; Baird 2009). Within the assessment region, this species has been recorded along the shelf edge, between 31°S on South Africa’s west coast, and 29°S on the east coast (Skinner & Chimimba 2005; Best 2007). Along the west coast, sightings have been reported from Saldanha Bay, and strandings between 23°S and 21°S have been recorded from Namibia (Findlay et al. 1992). On the east coast, Risso’s Dolphins have been documented well offshore, along the 1,000 m isobath (Ross 1984) and strandings occur along the entire coastlines of the Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal (Plön et al., 2020). 

Elevation / Depth / Depth Zones 

Elevation Lower Limit (in metres above sea level): (Not specified) 

Elevation Upper Limit (in metres above sea level): (Not specified) 

Depth Lower Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified) 

Depth Upper Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified) 

Depth Zone: (Not specified) 

Map

Figure 1. Distribution records for Risso’s Dolphin (Grampus griseus) within the assessment region (South Africa, Eswatini and Lesotho). Note that distribution data is obtained from multiple sources and records have not all been individually verified.

Biogeographic Realms 

Biogeographic Realm: Afrotropical, Australasian, Indomalayan, Nearctic, Neotropical, Palearctic 

Occurrence 

Countries of Occurrence 

Country  Presence  Origin  Formerly Bred  Seasonality 
Albania  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Algeria  Extant  Native    Resident 
American Samoa  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Angola  Extant  Native    Resident 
Anguilla  Extant  Native    Resident 
Antigua and Barbuda  Extant  Native    Resident 
Argentina  Extant  Native    Resident 
Aruba  Extant  Native    Resident 
Australia  Extant  Native    Resident 
Bahamas  Extant  Native    Resident 
Bahrain  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Bangladesh  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Barbados  Extant  Native    Resident 
Belgium  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Belize  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Benin  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Bermuda  Extant  Native    Resident 
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba  Extant  Native    Resident 
Bosnia and Herzegovina  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Brazil  Extant  Native    Resident 
British Indian Ocean Territory  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Brunei Darussalam  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Cabo Verde  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Cambodia  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Cameroon  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Canada  Extant  Native    Resident 
Cayman Islands  Extant  Native    Resident 
Chile  Extant  Native    Resident 
China  Extant  Native    Resident 
Christmas Island  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Cocos (Keeling) Islands  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Colombia  Extant  Native    Resident 
Comoros  Extant  Native    Resident 
Congo  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Cook Islands  Extant  Native    Resident 
Costa Rica  Extant  Native    Resident 
Croatia  Extant  Native    Resident 
Cuba  Extant  Native    Resident 
Curaçao  Extant  Native    Resident 
Cyprus  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Côte d’Ivoire  Extant  Native    Resident 
Denmark  Extant  Native    Resident 
Djibouti  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Dominica  Extant  Native    Resident 
Dominican Republic  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Ecuador  Extant  Native    Resident 
Egypt  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
El Salvador  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Equatorial Guinea  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Eritrea  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Fiji  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
France  Extant  Native    Resident 
French Guiana  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
French Polynesia  Extant  Native    Resident 
French Southern Territories  Extant  Native    Resident 
French Southern Territories -> Mozambique Channel Is.  Extant  Native    Resident 
Gabon  Extant  Native    Resident 
Gambia  Extant  Native    Resident 
Germany  Extant  Native    Resident 
Ghana  Extant  Native    Resident 
Gibraltar  Extant  Native    Resident 
Greece  Extant  Native    Resident 
Grenada  Extant  Native    Resident 
Guadeloupe  Extant  Native    Resident 
Guam  Extant  Native    Resident 
Guatemala  Extant  Native    Resident 
Guernsey  Extant  Native    Resident 
Guinea  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Guinea-Bissau  Extant  Native    Resident 
Guyana  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Haiti  Extant  Native    Resident 
Honduras  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Hong Kong  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
India  Extant  Native    Resident 
Indonesia  Extant  Native    Resident 
Iran, Islamic Republic of  Extant  Native    Resident 
Ireland  Extant  Native    Resident 
Isle of Man  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Israel  Extant  Native    Resident 
Italy  Extant  Native    Resident 
Jamaica  Extant  Native    Resident 
Japan  Extant  Native    Resident 
Jersey  Extant  Native    Resident 
Jordan  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Kenya  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Kiribati  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Korea, Republic of  Extant  Native    Resident 
Lebanon  Extant  Native    Resident 
Liberia  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Madagascar  Extant  Native    Resident 
Malaysia  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Maldives  Extant  Native    Resident 
Malta  Extant  Native    Resident 
Marshall Islands  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Martinique  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Mauritania  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Mauritius  Extant  Native    Resident 
Mayotte  Extant  Native    Resident 
Mexico  Extant  Native    Resident 
Micronesia, Federated States of  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Monaco  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Montenegro  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Montserrat  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Morocco  Extant  Native    Resident 
Mozambique  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Myanmar  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Namibia  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Nauru  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Netherlands  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
New Caledonia  Extant  Native    Resident 
New Zealand  Extant  Native    Resident 
Nicaragua  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Nigeria  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Niue  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Northern Mariana Islands  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Norway  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Oman  Extant  Native    Resident 
Pakistan  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Palau  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Panama  Extant  Native    Resident 
Papua New Guinea  Extant  Native    Resident 
Peru  Extant  Native    Resident 
Philippines  Extant  Native    Resident 
Pitcairn  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Portugal  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Puerto Rico  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Qatar  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Russian Federation  Extant  Native    Resident 
Saint Barthélemy  Extant  Native    Resident 
Saint Kitts and Nevis  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Saint Lucia  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Saint Martin (French part)  Extant  Native    Resident 
Saint Pierre and Miquelon  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Samoa  Extant  Native    Resident 
Sao Tome and Principe  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Saudi Arabia  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Senegal  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Seychelles  Extant  Native    Resident 
Sierra Leone  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Singapore  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)  Extant  Native    Resident 
Slovenia  Extant  Native    Resident 
Solomon Islands  Extant  Native    Resident 
Somalia  Extant  Native    Resident 
South Africa  Extant  Native    Resident 
Spain  Extant  Native    Resident 
Sri Lanka  Extant  Native    Resident 
Sudan  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Suriname  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Sweden  Extant  Native    Resident 
Syrian Arab Republic  Extant  Native    Resident 
Taiwan, Province of China  Extant  Native    Resident 
Tanzania, United Republic of  Extant  Native    Resident 
Thailand  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Timor-Leste  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Togo  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Tonga  Extant  Native    Resident 
Trinidad and Tobago  Extant  Native    Resident 
Tunisia  Extant  Native    Resident 
Turks and Caicos Islands  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Tuvalu  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Türkiye  Extant  Native    Resident 
United Arab Emirates  Extant  Native    Resident 
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  Extant  Native    Resident 
United States Minor Outlying Islands  Extant  Native    Resident 
United States Minor Outlying Islands -> Midway Is.  Extant  Native    Resident 
United States of America  Extant  Native    Resident 
Uruguay  Extant  Native    Resident 
Vanuatu  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of  Extant  Native    Resident 
Viet Nam  Extant  Native    Resident 
Virgin Islands, British  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Virgin Islands, U.S.  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Wallis and Futuna  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Western Sahara  Presence Uncertain  Native    Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain 
Yemen  Extant  Native    Resident 

Large Marine Ecosystems (LME) Occurrence 

Large Marine Ecosystems: (Not specified) 

FAO Area Occurrence 

  Presence  Origin  Formerly Bred  Seasonality 
21. Atlantic – northwest  Extant  Native    Resident 
27. Atlantic – northeast  Extant  Native    Resident 
31. Atlantic – western central  Extant  Native    Resident 
34. Atlantic – eastern central  Extant  Native    Resident 
37. Mediterranean and Black Sea  Extant  Native    Resident 
41. Atlantic – southwest  Extant  Native    Resident 
47. Atlantic – southeast  Extant  Native    Resident 
51. Indian Ocean – western  Extant  Native    Resident 
57. Indian Ocean – eastern  Extant  Native    Resident 
61. Pacific – northwest  Extant  Native    Resident 
67. Pacific – northeast  Extant  Native    Resident 
71. Pacific – western central  Extant  Native    Resident 
77. Pacific – eastern central  Extant  Native    Resident 
81. Pacific – southwest  Extant  Native    Resident 
87. Pacific – southeast  Extant  Native    Resident 

Climate change

Climate change affects cetaceans through a reduction in prey availability and a shift in the distribution of prey species (Kebke et al. 2022). This in turn results in a change in distribution range of cetaceans. In addition to affecting distribution range and abundance, climate change can also impact migration timing and behaviour (Kebke et al. 2022). With the reduction in food availability comes a change in body condition, leading to a decline in reproductive success. However, these impacts are all species-specific. Specific research needs to be carried on the impact and severity of climate change on Risso’s Dolphin.  

Population

No global population estimates or trends are available for Risso’s Dolphins, and although some regional estimates exist for other areas (Baird 2009), these are lacking for the assessment region. Differences in length at birth and maximum body length between individuals from the Western and Eastern Cape may indicate different populations being present in the southeast Atlantic vs. the western Indian Ocean (Plön et al. 2020). The decline of reported strandings off the south-eastern coastline of South Africa since the 1980’s may be indicative of a population decline or of animals moving out of the area (Plön et al. 2020). However, based on the frequency of strandings (approximately 8 per year on South Africa’s east coast), a relatively high population abundance is expected in South African waters. Generally, in regions where their ranges overlap, Risso’s Dolphins are more abundant than other closely related cetaceans, including pilot whales (Globicephala spp.), False Killer Whales (Pseudorca crassidens), Melon-headed Whales (Peponocephala electra) and Pygmy Killer Whales (Feresa attenuata; Baird 2009). Taylor et al. (2007) estimated a generation period of 19.6 years for this species. 

Current population trend: Unknown  

Continuing decline in mature individuals: Unknown  

Number of mature individuals in population: Unknown  

Number of mature individuals in largest subpopulation: Unknown  

Number of subpopulations: Unknown  

Severely fragmented: No 

Extreme fluctuations in the number of subpopulations: (Not specified) 

Continuing decline in number of subpopulations: (Not specified) 

All individuals in one subpopulation: (Not specified) 

Quantitative Analysis 

Probability of extinction in the wild within 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified) 

Probability of extinction in the wild within 5 generations or 20 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified) 

Probability of extinction in the wild within 100 years: (Not specified) 

Population Genetics

Little is known about the population genetics of Risso’s dolphins, because they live in small, isolated coastal populations, making it difficult to determine biologically meaningful separation distances between populations. However, a doctoral study using mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) showed that G. griseus in the North Pacific Ocean was divided into three distinct genetic subpopulations that generally corresponded to existing biogeographic provinces (Chen 2016). The study also reported the direction of gene flow to follow mainstream currents. Additionally, the data showed these Pacific populations to be genetically distinct from the subpopulations in the eastern North Atlantic Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea. No population genetic study has been undertaken on the species within the Southern Hemisphere, making it difficult to clearly state the number of populations within the assessment region. However, it is possible that two subpopulations exist associated with the Agulhas and Benguela currents. While little information is known, it is assumed these subpopulations are intact and no other subpopulations within the assessment region have been lost. Based on this, the proportion of populations maintained (PM) indicator is 2/2 =1.0. Due to no information on population size or density, the Ne 500 indicator (proportion of population within a species with an effective population size > 500) cannot be quantified.  

It is highly recommended that available tissue samples be genotyped, and genetic diversity metrics quantified to get a better idea of the genetic health of the species surrounding South Africa. 

Habitats and ecology

Generally inhabiting deep pelagic waters, Risso’s Dolphins are often associated with regions along, and seaward from, the continental slope (Baird 2009). Although, some geographic shifts in abundance have been documented off North America’s west coast, seasonal movements in the assessment region are unknown (Best 2007) and sightings and stranding records still occur throughout the year (Findlay 1989; Ross 1984). Stranding data between 1958 and 2017 from the south-east coast of South Africa indicated a decline in the number of reported strandings since the 1980’s: while a mean of 5.6 ± 4.7 animals were reported stranded per annum during that decade, subsequent decades showed a decline and only 0.4± 0.7 animals/year were reported stranded between 2000 and 2017; no strandings were documented in that area between 2013 and 2017 (Plön et al. 220).The range of Risso’s dolphins appears to be somewhat restricted by water temperature, with populations most commonly occurring in waters between 15°C and 20°C, and very infrequently inhabiting waters below 10°C (Baird 2009).

This species is thought to feed almost exclusively on cephalopods (Baird 2009). In fact, the stomach contents of individuals stranded in the Eastern Cape between 1958 and 2017 were comprised entirely of cephalopod remains (Plön et al. 2020; Best 2007; Cockcroft et al. 1993). Of the 19 prey species identified, the most important cephalopod species, constituting 81% of the prey mass, was the Cape Hope/Chokka squid Loligo reynaudii (previously considered a subspecies of Loligo vulgaris, i.e. L.v. reynaudii; Cockcroft et al. 1993). This analysis suggested that these individuals fed within the Agulhas Current and along the narrow regions of the continental shelf (Cockcroft et al. 1993). The diversity of the consumed prey differed between males and females as well as between dolphin size classes (Plön et al. 2020; Cockcroft et al. 1993). Fish species, such as anchovy (Engraulis capensis) and Cape Horse Mackerel (Trachurus trachurus capensis) represented a minor proportion of the diet of individuals from the Western Cape, with 14 species of cephalopods making up the remaining proportion, mostly Octopus spp. (Sekiguchi et al. 1992). Based on limited data, this species is thought to feed predominantly at night (Baird 2009).

This gregarious species characteristically travels in groups of between 10 and 50 individuals and is frequently associated with other cetaceans (Baird 2009). Ross (1984) suggested that Risso’s Dolphins exhibit seasonal reproduction, giving birth in the austral late spring and summer (December–April) following a gestation period of 10-11 months (Best 2007). Length at birth is approximately 1.3 m and calves are estimated to grow at a rate of 0.46 cm/day (Best 2007).

Ecosystem and cultural services: Marine mammals integrate and reflect ecological variation across large spatial and long temporal scales, and therefore they are prime sentinels of marine ecosystem change (Moore 2008). Thus the decline in reported strandings for the species off the south-eastern coastline of South Africa may reflect a lack of reporting associated with a ban on driving on beaches or may be related to the collapse of the local “chokka” squid (Loligo reynaudii) fishery in 2014–2015 (Githaiga-Mwicigi and van der Westhuizen, 2017), likely resulting in animals moving out of the area (Plön et al. 2020). 

IUCN Habitats Classification Scheme 

Habitat  Season  Suitability  Major Importance? 
10.1. Marine Oceanic -> Marine Oceanic – Epipelagic (0-200m)    Marginal   
10.2. Marine Oceanic -> Marine Oceanic – Mesopelagic (200-1000m)    Suitable  Yes 
10.3. Marine Oceanic -> Marine Oceanic – Bathypelagic (1000-4000m)    Marginal   

Life History 

Generation Length: (Not specified) 

Age at Maturity: Female or unspecified: 7.7 yrs (Plön et al. 2020) 

Age at Maturity: Male: 7.1 yrs (Plön et al. 2020) 

Size at Maturity (in cms): Female: 282 cm (Plön et al. 2020) 

Size at Maturity (in cms): Male: 280 cm (Plön et al. 2020) 

Longevity: Maximum age estimates are 17 yrs for females and 13 yrs for males from south-eastern South Africa; however, the oldest age estimate was obtained for a 300-cm-long animal of unknown sex, which had 19 cemental growth-layer-groups (GLGs; Plön et al. 2020). However, previous age estimates for the species were 34.5 years for females (Amano and Miyazaki, 2004) and 30 years for males (Kruse et al. 1999). 

Average Reproductive Age: Age at female maturity 8-10 yrs and approximately 10-12 years in males (Best 2007) 

Maximum Size (in cms): 313cm for females, 325cm for males from south-eastern South Africa (Plön et al. 2020), although Best (2007) reports 318 cm for females and 341 cm for males.  

Size at Birth (in cms): smallest female: 124 cm, smallest male: 135 cm; but average length at birth based on data from nine neonates was calculated to be 146.9 cm (Plön et al. 2020). 

Gestation Time: 10-11 months 

Reproductive Periodicity: (Not specified) 

Average Annual Fecundity or Litter Size: a single calf may be born on average at intervals of at least 2.4 years (Best 2007). 

Natural Mortality: (Not specified) 

Breeding Strategy 

Does the species lay eggs?  No 

Does the species give birth to live young:  Yes 

Does the species exhibit parthenogenesis:  No 

Does the species have a free-living larval stage?  No 

Does the species require water for breeding?  Yes 

 Movement Patterns 

Movement Patterns: (Not specified) 

Congregatory: (Not specified) 

Systems 

System: Marine 

General Use and Trade Information

Although historical exploitation of this species has been documented in Japanese waters (Mitchell 1975b), there is no trade or use of this species within the assessment region. 

Subsistence: 

Rationale: 

Local Commercial: 

Further detail including information on economic value if available: 

Yes 

 

 

 

National Commercial Value: Yes 

International Commercial Value: No 

End Use 

Subsistence 

National 

International 

Other (please specify) 

1. Food – human 

true 

true 

 

 

5. Manufacturing chemicals 

 

true 

 

 

Is there harvest from captive/cultivated sources of this species? No 

Harvest Trend Comments: N/a 

Threats

The Chokka Squid (Loligo vulgaris reynaudii) is the second most important prey species, in terms of numbers and frequency, and the most important species in terms of mass (Plön et al. 2020). Thus, competition with the Chokka fishery could pose a real threat to this species, however, currently this has not been documented, and no direct observations have been made. Linked to this, Risso’s Dolphins sometimes remove bait from longline fisheries, thus they are occasionally deliberately shot by aggravated fishermen. The inshore area utilised by the Chokka fishery is only a small part of this species’ range, thus it is suspected to be a minor threat. In other parts of its range, this species has been recorded as accidental bycatch in gillnet and seine-net fisheries (Baird 2009). 
 
Similar to beaked whales, this species may be vulnerable to marine noise pollution produced by, for example, navy sonar and seismic exploration (Cox et al. 2006), and future oil and gas drilling and extraction. Additionally, the increasing risk of plastic pollution (Baird 2002) and global climate change (Learmonth et al. 2006) should also be recognised as minor threats to this species, although the severity of these impacts requires confirmation. 

Conservation

Risso’s Dolphin is listed in Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and this species is protected by the Marine Living Resources Act (No. 18 of 1998) of the national legislation. No species-specific conservation measures have been recognised. However, based on the likelihood of depredation on longline and Chokka fisheries, and the resulting persecution of this species by local fishermen, systematic monitoring of this species is required, specifically in view of a decline in reported strandings of the species, possibly in association with a collapse of the local “chokka” squid fishery (Plön et al. 2020). Additionally, continued research into the general ecology and severity of threats to this species, specifically from various anthropogenic impacts, would be beneficial.

Recommendations for managers and practitioners: 

  • Systematic monitoring of this species in the assessment region, particularly with regards to their interactions with long-line and Chokka fisheries. 

Research priorities: 

  • The severity and potential impacts of threats, specifically the impacts of competition, bycatch and persecution with fisheries. 
  • Population status and trends in abundance. 
  • The general ecology of Risso’s Dolphins off South Africa. 
  • Genetic analyses and comparison with specimens outside of the assessment region to identify subpopulations and conservation management units. 
  • Improved collaboration with platforms of opportunity for sightings contributions (e.g., NeMMO initiative under IndoCet) and submission to OCIMs (ocims.environment.gov.za) for monitoring. 

Encouraged citizen actions: 

  • Use information dispensed by the South African Sustainable Seafood Initiative (SASSI) to make good choices when buying fish in shops and restaurants, e.g. wwfsa.mobi, FishMS 0794998795. 
  • Save electricity and fuel to mitigate CO2 emissions and hence, the rate of climate change. 
  • Buy local products that have not been shipped. 
  • Report sightings on virtual museum platforms (for example, iNaturalist and MammalMAP) to help with mapping geographical distribution. Sightings data from pelagic commercial tourism operators may be particularly valuable (see NeMMO initiative of IndoCet). 
  • Report any strandings to the relevant local authorities. 

Bibliography

Baird, R. W. 2002. Risso’s dolphin Grampus griseus. In: W. F. Perrin, B. Wursig and J. G. M. Thewissen (eds), Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals, pp. 1037-1039. Academic Press. 

Amano, M. and Miyazaki, N. 2004. Composition of a school of Risso’s dolphins, Grampus griseus.  Marine Mammal Science 20(1): 152-160. 

Baird, R. W. 2009. Risso’s dolphin Grampus griseus. In W. F. Perrin, B. Würsig, & J. G. M. Thewissen (Eds.), Encyclopedia of marine mammals (2nd ed., pp. 975–976). New York, NY: Academic Press. 

Best, P. B. B. 2007. Whales and Dolphins of the Southern African Subregion. Cambridge University Press, Cape Town. 338pp. 

Cockcroft VG, Haschick SL, Klages NTW. 1993. The diet of Risso’s dolphin, Grampus griseus (Cuvier, 1812), from the east coast of South Africa. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 58: 286-293. 

Cox, T.M., Ragen, T.J., Read, A.J., Vos, E., Baird, R.W., Balcomb, K., Barlow, J., Caldwell, J., Cranford, T., Crum, L., D’Amico, A., D’Spain, A., Fernández, J., Finneran, J., Gentry, R., Gerth, W., Gulland, F., Hildebrand, J., Houser, D., Hullar, T., Jepson, P.D., Ketten, D., Macleod, C.D., Miller, P., Moore, S., Mountain, D., Palka, D., Ponganis, P., Rommel, S., Rowles, T., Taylor, B., Tyack, P., Wartzok, D., Gisiner, R., Mead, J. and Benner, L. 2006. Understanding the impacts of anthropogenic sound on beaked whales. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management 7(3): 177-187. 

Findlay KP, Best PB, Ross GJB, Cockcroft VG. 1992. The distribution of small odontocete cetaceans off the coasts of South Africa and Namibia. South African Journal of Marine Science 12: 237-270. 

Findlay KP. 1989. The distribution of cetaceans off the coast of South Africa and South West Africa/Namibia. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa. 

IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). 2012. Grampus griseus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 3.1. Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org 

Kebke A, Samarra F, Derous D. 2022 Climate change and cetacean health: impacts and future directions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 377: 20210249. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0249   

Kruse, S., Caldwell, D. K. and Caldwell, M. C. 1999. Risso’s dolphin Grampus griseus (G. Cuvier, 1812). In: S. H. Ridgway and R. Harrison (eds), Handbook of marine mammals, pp. 183-212. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA. 

Learmonth, J.A., Macleod, C.D., Santos, M.B., Pierce, G.J., Crick, H.Q.P. and Robinson, R.A. 2006. Potential effects of climate change on marine mammals. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 44: 431-464. 

Mitchell E. 1975a. Review of biology and fisheries for smaller cetaceans: report and papers from a meeting on smaller cetaceans, Montreal, April 1–11, 1974. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 32: 889-983. 

Mitchell, E. 1975b. Porpoise, dolphin and small whale fisheries of the world. IUCN Monograph 3: 1-129. 

Moore SE. 2008. Marine mammals as ecosystem sentinels. Journal of Mammalogy 89: 534-540.Plön, S., Heyns-Veale, E., Smale M. J.  and Froneman, P. W. 2020. Life history parameters and diet of Risso’s dolphins (Grampus griseus, Cuvier, 1812) from southeastern South Africa. Marine Mammal Science 36 (3): 786-801.  

Ross GJ. 1984. Smaller cetaceans of the south-east coast of southern Africa. Annals of the Cape Provincial Museums. Natural History 16: 309-319. 

Sekiguchi, K., Klages, N.T.W. and Best, P.B. 1992. Comparative analysis of the diets of smaller odontocete cetaceans along the coast of southern Africa. South African Journal of Marine Science 12: 843-861. 

Skinner, J.D. and Chimimba, C.T. (eds). 2005. The Mammals of the Southern African Subregion. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, Cambridge. 

Taylor, B.L., Chivers, S.J., Larese, J. and Perrin, W.F. 2007. Generation length and percent mature estimates for IUCN assessments of cetaceans. NOAA, Southwest Fisheries Science Center Administrative Report LJ-07-01. La Jolla, California. 

True FW. 1889. Contributions to the natural history of the cetaceans. A review of the family Delphinidae. Bulletin of the United States National Museum 36: 191.